🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials requests proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during broader worries about industry interference with medical guidelines. Recently, WHO officials sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of corporate influence worldwide. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” said Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

In the letter, BAT suggests this be decreased to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least half of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the managing director of the African subsidiary says the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We live in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my garden and collect the yield and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator said: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Further, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which enable stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, they said, noting that young individuals should be shielded from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, adding that the company's suggestions “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which involves increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.