🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Costly

According to recent research, typical households spends $27,000 annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making average wages must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast that with what average American pays. I know dozens of businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding medical services. When including those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for employers as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire the majority of American employees and generate half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a superior and less expensive approach for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this current situation is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.