🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam order, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to use a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that could add up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, handed down on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to set aside a district court's ruling that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Explanation

The federal judge erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating much confusion and disturbing the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its ruling.

That lower court had determined that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the new maps. It had mandated the state to employ the boundaries drawn after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Strong Dissent

Through a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She contended that it disrespected the work of the district court, observing that its decision was actually authored by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a violation of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Battle

The ruling comes amid a countrywide fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican majority. Typically, map-drawing occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that are estimated to yield a number of additional Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas top lawyer praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes favorable to the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

On the other hand, opposition party officials criticized the decision. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major party election organization.

Another leading House leader stated the court had another time damaged its credibility by upholding a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.